International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 86B

Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components





Approval %
16 16 100 >=66.7% APPROVED


Number of


approving and

23 6 >=4 (if <=16)
>=5 (if >=17)

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result


Document 86B/4265/NP


Project : IEC 61753-051-02 ED1

PNW 86B-4265: Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components - Performance standard - Part 051-02: Plug-receptacle style single-mode fibre fixed optical attenuators for category C - Controlled environments


Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
86B/4265/NP 2020-01-10 2020-04-03
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Australia O -
Austria P 2020-04-03 Y Y N -
Belarus - 2020-04-03 Y Y N -
Belgium P 2020-04-03 Y Y Y -
Brazil O 2020-04-03 A N -
Bulgaria O -
Canada P 2020-03-27 Y Y N -
China P 2020-03-23 Y Y N Y
Czech Republic P 2020-04-03 Y Y N -
Denmark O 2020-04-02 A Y N -
Finland P 2020-03-24 Y Y N -
France P 2020-04-03 Y Y N Y
Germany P 2020-03-23 Y Y Y -
Greece O 2020-04-03 Y Y N -
Hungary O -
India P 2020-04-02 A N -
Indonesia O -
Iran O 2020-04-01 A Y N -
Ireland O -
Israel P 2020-04-02 A N -
Italy P 2020-04-02 Y Y Y Y
Japan P 2020-01-21 Y Y Y Y
Korea, Republic of P 2020-04-03 Y Y N -
Malaysia O -
Mexico P 2020-04-03 A N -
Netherlands P 2020-03-23 A N -
New Zealand O -
Norway O 2020-03-30 A Y N -
Pakistan P -
Poland P 2020-03-31 Y Y N -
Portugal P 2020-04-03 A N -
Qatar - 2020-04-03 A Y N -
Romania O -
Russian Federation O 2020-04-03 Y Y N -
Saudi Arabia O -
Serbia O -
Slovakia P 2020-03-09 Y Y N -
South Africa O -
Spain O -
Sweden P 2020-03-30 Y Y Y -
Switzerland P 2020-03-18 Y Y N Y
Thailand O -
Turkey O -
Ukraine O -
United Arab Emirates - 2020-03-31 A N -
United Kingdom P 2020-03-10 A Y N -
United States of America P 2020-03-30 Y Y Y -


The final result of voting will be indicated in the Report of Voting (RVN), as P-members have the possibility to nominate an expert within four weeks after the closing date.

  • 1. Vote: Does the National Committee approve the addition of the new proposal to the program of work of the committee?
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  • 2. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  • 3. Only votes received from P-members before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.

  • 4. If approved, should the next stage be a Committee Draft or a Committee Draft for Vote?

  • 5. Is the National Committee prepared to participate in the development of the project? [Y/N]
    Note: Only the participation of those voting in favour of the proposal are taken into account.

P-members not voting: Pakistan(1)

*Comments not included in the compiled table, available as a separate file, because they were not submitted using the template Form-Comments.