International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 86B

Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components

 

P-Members vote

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
15 15 100 >50% APPROVED


 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 86B/4231/DPAS

 

Project : IEC PAS 63267-3-31 ED1

IEC PAS 63267-3-31 ED1: Fibre optic connector optical interfaces - Part 3-31: End face geometry flat PC end face PPS rectangular ferrule, multimode fibres

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
86B/4231/DPAS 2019-08-30 2019-10-25

Compilation of Comments
CC file    
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia O -
Austria P 2019-10-24 A -
Belarus - 2019-10-25 Y -
Belgium P 2019-10-24 Y -
Brazil O 2019-10-25 A -
Bulgaria O -
Canada P 2019-09-17 Y -
China P 2019-10-14 Y -
Czech Republic P 2019-10-24 Y -
Denmark O 2019-10-11 A -
Finland P 2019-10-07 Y -
France P 2019-10-25 Y Y
Germany P 2019-09-27 Y Y
Greece O 2019-10-25 Y -
Hungary O -
India P 2019-10-25 A -
Indonesia O -
Iran O -
Ireland O -
Israel P 2019-10-24 A -
Italy P 2019-10-24 Y -
Japan P -
Korea, Republic of P 2019-10-25 Y -
Malaysia O -
Mexico P 2019-10-17 Y -
Netherlands P 2019-10-14 A -
New Zealand O -
Norway O 2019-10-21 A -
Pakistan P 2019-10-17 Y -
Poland P 2019-10-25 Y -
Portugal P 2019-10-25 A -
Qatar - 2019-10-24 A -
Romania O -
Russian Federation O 2019-10-24 Y -
Saudi Arabia O -
Serbia O -
Slovakia P 2019-10-17 Y -
South Africa O -
Spain O -
Sweden P 2019-10-15 A -
Switzerland P 2019-10-25 Y -
Thailand O -
Turkey O -
Ukraine O -
United Kingdom P 2019-10-08 A -
United States of America P 2019-10-22 Y Y

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to publish the DPAS draft as a Public Available Specification?
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  3. P-members not voting: Japan (1).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.