TC 103

Transmitting and receiving equipment for radiocommunication

 

Approval

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

Approving
Approval %
Criteria
Result
10 10 100 >=66.7% APPROVED

Participation

Number of

P-Members
P-Members

approving and

participating
Criteria
Result
11 7 >=4 (if <=16)
>=5 (if >=17)
APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 103/205/NP

 

Project : IEC 63098-4 ED1

PNW 103-205 ED1: Transmitting Equipment for Radiocommunication – Radio-over-Fibre Technologies and Their Performance Standard - Part 4: Radio-over- fibre based indoor DAS (distributed antenna system) for 5G

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
103/205/NP 2020-11-20 2021-02-12
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Approving
CD
CDV
Participation
Comments
Austria O 2021-02-10 A Y N -
Belgium O 2021-02-12 A N -
Bulgaria O -
China P 2021-02-01 Y Y Y -
Czech Republic O -
Denmark O -
Finland O 2020-11-23 A Y N -
France O 2021-01-25 A Y N -
Germany P 2020-11-25 A N -
Greece O 2021-02-12 A N -
Hungary O -
India O -
Iran O -
Italy P 2021-02-09 Y Y Y -
Japan P 2020-11-26 Y Y Y -
Korea, Republic of P 2021-02-09 Y Y Y -
New Zealand O -
Norway O -
Pakistan P 2021-02-12 Y Y N -
Poland P 2021-02-11 Y Y Y -
Portugal O 2021-02-12 A Y N -
Romania P 2021-02-12 Y Y N -
Russian Federation P 2021-02-05 Y Y N -
Serbia O -
Slovakia O -
Spain O -
Sweden O -
Switzerland P 2021-02-11 Y Y Y -
Turkey O -
United Arab Emirates - 2021-02-11 Y Y N -
United Kingdom P 2021-02-05 Y Y Y -
United States of America - 2021-02-08 A N -

NOTES:


The final result of voting will be indicated in the Report of Voting (RVN), as P-members have the possibility to nominate an expert within four weeks after the closing date.



  • 1. Vote: Does the National Committee approve the addition of the new proposal to the program of work of the committee?
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  • 2. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  • 3. Only votes received from P-members before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.

  • 4. If approved, should the next stage be a Committee Draft or a Committee Draft for Vote?

  • 5. Is the National Committee prepared to participate in the development of the project? [Y/N]
    Note: Only the participation of those voting in favour of the proposal are taken into account.


P-members not voting: (0)


*Comments not included in the compiled table, available as a separate file, because they were not submitted using the template Form-Comments.