International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 86C

Fibre optic systems and active devices

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
13 13 100 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
20 0 0 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 86C/1077/CDV

 

Project : IEC 62343-1-3:2012 ED2

IEC 62343-1-3/Ed2: Dynamic modules - Part 1-3: Performance standards - Dynamic gain tilt equalizer (non-connectorized)

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
86C/1077/CDV 2012-07-06 2012-10-12
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
86C/1092/RVC 2012-10-19  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia O 2012-10-12 Y -
Austria P 2012-10-10 A -
Belgium O 2012-09-18 A -
Brazil O 2012-10-11 A -
Bulgaria O
Canada P 2012-10-09 Y -
China P 2012-10-12 Y -
Cyprus P
Czech Republic O
Denmark P 2012-10-09 A -
Finland P 2012-09-17 Y -
France P 2012-10-08 Y -
Germany P 2012-10-12 Y -
Greece O 2012-10-11 Y -
Hungary O
India O 2012-10-10 Y -
Ireland O 2012-09-26 Y -
Israel P 2012-10-10 A -
Italy P 2012-10-10 Y -
Japan P 2012-09-11 Y Y
Korea, Republic of P 2012-10-12 Y -
Mexico O 2012-10-12 Y -
Netherlands P 2012-10-03 A -
New Zealand O
Norway O
Pakistan P 2012-10-12 Y -
Poland P 2012-10-11 Y -
Portugal O 2012-10-12 Y -
Qatar - 2012-10-10 Y -
Romania P 2012-10-10 Y -
Russian Federation P 2012-10-11 Y -
Serbia O
Slovakia P 2012-10-10 A -
South Africa O
Spain P 2012-10-09 A -
Sweden P 2012-10-09 A -
Switzerland P 2012-09-20 A -
Thailand P
Turkey O
Ukraine O
United Kingdom P 2012-09-12 A -
United States of America P 2012-10-04 Y -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  3. P-members not voting: Cyprus; Thailand(2).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.