International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 86C

Fibre optic systems and active devices





Approval %
15 15 100 >50% APPROVED


Number of


approving and

24 4 >=4 (if <=16)
>=5 (if >=17)

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

Document 86C/1075/NP


Project : IEC 62149-8:2014 ED1

Future IEC 62149-8/Ed1: Fibre optic active components and devices - Performance standard - Part 8: Seeded reflective semiconductor optical amplifier devices


Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
86C/1075/NP 2012-06-22 2012-09-28
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
86C/1093/RVN 2012-10-26  
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Australia O
Austria P 2012-09-26 A N N N -
Belgium O 2012-09-04 A N N N -
Brazil O 2012-09-28 A N N N -
Bulgaria O
Canada P 2012-09-27 A N N N -
China P 2012-09-28 Y Y N N -
Cyprus P
Czech Republic O
Denmark P 2012-09-26 Y Y N N -
Finland P 2012-09-17 Y Y N N -
France P 2012-09-27 Y N N N Y
Germany P 2012-09-24 Y Y N Y -
Greece O 2012-09-28 Y N N N -
Hungary O
India O 2012-09-24 Y N N N -
Ireland O 2012-09-06 Y Y N N -
Israel P 2012-09-27 A N N N -
Italy P 2012-09-25 Y Y N Y -
Japan P 2012-09-25 Y N N Y -
Korea, Republic of P 2012-09-27 Y Y N Y -
Mexico O 2012-09-28 A N N N -
Netherlands P 2012-09-14 A N N N -
New Zealand O
Norway O
Pakistan P 2012-09-28 Y N N N -
Poland P 2012-09-04 Y N N N -
Portugal O 2012-09-28 Y N N N -
Qatar - 2012-09-26 Y Y N N -
Romania P 2012-09-27 Y N Y N -
Russian Federation P 2012-09-28 Y N N N -
Serbia O
Slovakia P 2012-09-27 A N N N -
South Africa O
Spain P 2012-09-25 Y Y N N -
Sweden P 2012-09-25 A N N N -
Switzerland P 2012-09-19 A N N N -
Thailand P 2012-09-28 Y N N N -
Turkey O
Ukraine O
United Kingdom P 2012-09-10 A N N N -
United States of America P 2012-09-17 Y N N N Y


The final result of voting will be indicated in the Report of Voting (RVN), as P-members have the possibility to nominate an expert one month after the closing date -- complete information in AC/172/2000

  1. Approving: Does the National Committee approve the addition of the new proposal to the program of work of the committee [Yes/No] ?

  2. Only votes received from P-members before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.

  3. P-members not voting: Cyprus(1)

  4. CD/CDV: Does the National Committee agree with direct submission of the draft accompanying the proposal as a Committee Draft/Committee Draft for Voting [Y if Yes] ?

  5. Participation : Is the National Committee prepared to participate in the development of the project [Yes/No] ? (Only those voting in favour of the proposal itself have their willingness to participate considered as part of the final decision.)

  6. Acceptance criteria for TS/IS:

    • approval of the work item by a simple majority of the P-members voting

    • at least 4 P-members in the case of a committee with 16 or fewer P-members, or at least 5 P-members in the case of committees with 17 or more P-members, have nominated or confirmed the name of an expert and approved the new work item proposal

*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.