International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 86B

Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
19 19 100 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
23 0 0 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 86B/3711/CDV

 

Project : IEC 61755-3-31 Ed. 1.0

IEC 61755-3-31/Ed1: Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components - Fibre optic connector optical interfaces - Part 3-31: Optical interface, 8 degrees angled PC, Polyphenylene sulphide rectangular ferrule, single mode fibres

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
86B/3711/CDV 2014-02-07 2014-05-09
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
86B/3789/RVC 2014-05-23  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia P 2014-04-17 Y -
Austria P 2014-04-03 Y -
Belgium P 2014-04-24 Y -
Brazil O 2014-05-09 A -
Canada P 2014-05-05 Y -
China P 2014-05-09 Y -
Czech Republic P 2014-04-28 Y -
Denmark P 2014-04-30 A -
Finland P 2014-05-05 Y -
France P 2014-04-22 Y -
Germany P 2014-05-05 Y -
Greece O 2014-05-09 Y -
Ireland O 2014-04-10 Y -
Israel P 2014-05-08 A -
Italy P 2014-05-09 Y -
Japan P 2014-05-09 Y Y
Korea, Republic of P 2014-04-25 Y -
Latvia - 2014-05-08 A -
Mexico P 2014-05-08 Y -
Netherlands P 2014-05-06 Y Y
Pakistan P
Poland P 2014-05-06 A -
Portugal P 2014-05-09 A -
Qatar - 2014-05-07 A -
Romania O 2014-05-08 Y -
Russian Federation P 2014-05-07 Y -
Slovenia - 2014-05-09 Y -
Spain O 2014-04-29 A -
Sweden P 2014-05-05 Y -
Switzerland P 2014-05-05 Y -
Thailand P 2014-05-08 Y -
United Kingdom P 2014-04-22 Y -
United States of America P 2014-05-09 A -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: Pakistan(1).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.