SC 86B

Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components

Vote for P-Members

P-Members Voting	P-Members In favour	In favour %	Criteria	Result
20	19	95	>=66.7%	APPROVED

All Votes

Total Votes Cast	Total Against	Against %	Criteria	Result
23	1	4.3	<=25%	APPROVED

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 86B/3553/FDIS

Project : IEC 61753-059-2 Ed. 1.0

IEC 61753-059-2/Ed1: Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components - Performance standard - Part 059-2: Single-mode fibre plug-receptacle style optical limiter for category C - Controlled environment

Reference	Circulation date	Closing date	Downloads
86B/3553/FDIS	2012-12-14	2013-02-15
Voting Result
86B/3596/RVD	2013-02-22		145 kB

Result of Voting

Country	Status	Received	Vote	Comments
Australia	P	2013-02-15	Y	-
Austria	P	2013-01-30	Y	-
Belgium	P	2013-01-22	Y	-
Brazil	O	2013-02-15	A	-
Bulgaria	O
Canada	P	2013-02-08	Y	-
China	P	2013-02-05	Y	-
Czech Republic	P	2013-02-04	Y	-
Denmark	O	2013-01-23	A	-
Finland	P	2013-02-08	Y	-
France	P	2013-02-08	A	-
Germany	P	2013-02-08	Y	-
Greece	O	2013-02-15	Y	-
Hungary	O
India	O	2013-01-31	Y	-
Indonesia	O
Ireland	O	2013-02-05	Y	-
Israel	P	2013-02-14	A	-
Italy	P	2013-02-14	Y	-
Japan	P	2013-02-07	Y	-
Korea, Republic of	P	2013-02-15	Y	-
Mexico	P	2013-02-14	Y	-
Netherlands	P	2013-02-11	N	Y
New Zealand	O
Norway	O
Pakistan	P	2013-02-13	Y	-
Poland	P	2013-01-31	A	-
Portugal	P	2013-02-15	Y	-
Qatar	-	2013-02-14	A	-
Romania	O
Russian Federation	P	2013-02-15	Y	-
Saudi Arabia	O	2013-01-31	A	-
Serbia	O
Slovakia	O
South Africa	O
Spain	O	2013-02-05	A	-
Sweden	P	2013-02-12	A	-
Switzerland	P	2013-01-21	Y	-
Thailand	P	2013-02-15	Y	-
Turkey	O
Ukraine	O
United Kingdom	P	2013-01-18	Y	-
United States of America	P	2013-01-10	Y	-

NOTES:

Vote: Does the National Committee agree to publish the FDIS as an International Standard:
Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
Late Votes: (0).

Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

P-members not voting: (0).

*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.

International

Electrotechnical

Commission