International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 86B

Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components





Approval %
19 17 89.5 >50% APPROVED


Number of


approving and

24 4 >=4 (if <=16)
>=5 (if >=17)

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

Document 86B/3457/NP


Project : IEC 61753-053-2:2014 ED1

Future IEC 61753-053-2/Ed1: Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components - Performance standard - Part 053-2: Non-connectorised single-mode fibre electrically controlled variable optical attenuator for category C - Controlled environments


Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
86B/3457/NP 2012-06-15 2012-09-21
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
86B/3540/RVN 2012-10-26  
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Australia P
Austria P 2012-09-19 A N N N -
Belgium P 2012-08-31 Y N N N -
Brazil O 2012-09-21 A N N N -
Canada P 2012-09-19 Y N N N -
China P 2012-09-21 Y Y N N -
Czech Republic P 2012-08-31 Y Y N Y -
Denmark O 2012-09-18 A N N N -
Finland P 2012-09-17 Y Y N N -
France P 2012-09-17 N N N N Y
Germany P 2012-08-27 N N N N -
Greece O 2012-09-19 Y N N N -
India O 2012-09-13 Y N N N -
Ireland O 2012-09-04 Y Y N N -
Israel P 2012-09-20 A N N N -
Italy P 2012-09-20 Y Y N Y -
Japan P 2012-09-19 Y N N Y -
Korea, Republic of P 2012-09-21 Y Y N N -
Mexico P 2012-09-20 Y N N N -
Netherlands P 2012-09-14 A N N N -
Pakistan P 2012-09-20 Y N N N -
Poland P 2012-09-20 Y N N N -
Portugal P 2012-09-21 Y N N N -
Qatar - 2012-09-20 A Y N N -
Russian Federation P 2012-09-20 Y N N N -
Spain O 2012-09-11 A N N N -
Sweden P 2012-09-18 A N N N -
Switzerland P 2012-09-19 Y N N N -
Thailand P 2012-09-21 Y N N N -
United Kingdom P 2012-08-31 Y N N N Y
United States of America P 2012-08-16 Y N N Y -


The final result of voting will be indicated in the Report of Voting (RVN), as P-members have the possibility to nominate an expert one month after the closing date -- complete information in AC/172/2000

  1. Approving: Does the National Committee approve the addition of the new proposal to the program of work of the committee [Yes/No] ?

  2. Only votes received from P-members before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.

  3. P-members not voting: Australia(1)

  4. CD/CDV: Does the National Committee agree with direct submission of the draft accompanying the proposal as a Committee Draft/Committee Draft for Voting [Y if Yes] ?

  5. Participation : Is the National Committee prepared to participate in the development of the project [Yes/No] ? (Only those voting in favour of the proposal itself have their willingness to participate considered as part of the final decision.)

  6. Acceptance criteria for TS/IS:

    • approval of the work item by a simple majority of the P-members voting

    • at least 4 P-members in the case of a committee with 16 or fewer P-members, or at least 5 P-members in the case of committees with 17 or more P-members, have nominated or confirmed the name of an expert and approved the new work item proposal

*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.