International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 86B

Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
22 22 100 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
26 0 0 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 86B/3362/CDV

 

Project : IEC 61753-061-2 Ed. 1.0

IEC 61753-061-2/Ed1: Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components - Performance standard - Part 061-2: Non-connectorised single-mode fibre optic pigtailed isolators for category C - Controlled environments

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
86B/3362/CDV 2012-01-13 2012-04-13
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
86B/3446/RVC 2012-06-01  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia P 2012-04-13 Y -
Austria P 2012-04-12 Y -
Belgium P 2012-03-20 Y -
Brazil O 2012-04-13 A -
Canada P 2012-04-12 Y -
China P 2012-04-13 Y -
Czech Republic P 2012-03-19 Y -
Denmark O 2012-04-11 A -
Egypt - 2012-04-13 Y -
Finland P 2012-04-10 Y -
France P 2012-04-13 A -
Germany P 2012-03-23 Y -
Greece O 2012-04-11 Y -
Hungary P 2012-04-10 Y -
India P 2012-04-13 Y -
Ireland O 2012-04-03 Y -
Israel P 2012-04-04 A -
Italy P 2012-04-12 Y -
Japan P 2012-04-11 Y Y
Korea, Republic of P 2012-04-13 Y -
Mexico P 2012-04-13 Y -
Netherlands P 2012-03-15 Y -
Pakistan P
Poland P 2012-04-10 Y -
Portugal P 2012-04-13 Y -
Qatar - 2012-04-10 A -
Russian Federation P 2012-04-12 Y -
Saudi Arabia O 2012-03-03 Y -
Spain P 2012-04-02 A -
Sweden P 2012-04-10 Y -
Switzerland P 2012-04-05 A -
Thailand P 2012-04-11 Y -
United Kingdom P 2012-03-29 Y -
United States of America P 2012-03-26 Y -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: Pakistan(1).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.