International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 86B

Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components





Approval %
19 17 89.5 >50% APPROVED


Number of


approving and

28 7 >=4 (if <=16)
>=5 (if >=17)

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result


Document 86B/3336/NP


Project : IEC 61754-30:2014 ED1

Future IEC 61754-30 Ed. 1.0: Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components - Fibre optic connector interfaces - Part 30:Type CLIK connector series


Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
86B/3336/NP 2011-12-02 2012-03-02
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Australia P
Austria P 2012-02-15 Y N N Y -
Belgium P 2012-02-07 Y N N N -
Brazil O 2012-03-02 A N N N -
Bulgaria O
Canada P 2012-03-02 A N N N -
China P 2012-03-01 Y Y N N -
Czech Republic P 2012-02-28 Y Y N Y -
Denmark P 2012-02-28 A N N N -
Finland P 2012-02-28 Y Y N N -
France P 2012-02-28 N N N N Y
Germany P 2012-03-01 Y Y N Y Y
Greece O 2012-02-28 Y N N N -
Hungary P 2012-03-01 A N Y N -
India P 2012-02-23 Y N N N -
Indonesia O
Ireland O 2012-02-21 Y Y N N -
Israel P 2012-01-31 Y Y N Y -
Italy P 2012-03-02 Y Y N N -
Japan P 2012-02-29 Y N N Y -
Korea, Republic of P 2012-03-02 Y Y N N -
Mexico P 2012-03-01 Y N N N -
Netherlands P 2012-02-22 A N N N -
New Zealand O
Norway O
Pakistan P
Poland P
Portugal P 2012-03-02 A N N N -
Qatar - 2012-02-28 Y N N N -
Romania O
Russian Federation P 2012-02-22 Y N N N -
Saudi Arabia O
Serbia O
Slovakia O
South Africa O
Spain P 2012-02-27 Y Y N N -
Sweden P 2012-02-28 A N N N -
Switzerland P 2012-02-28 Y N N Y Y
Thailand P 2012-03-02 Y Y N N -
Turkey O
Ukraine O
United Kingdom P 2012-02-16 N N N N Y
United States of America P 2012-02-16 Y N N Y -


The final result of voting will be indicated in the Report of Voting (RVN), as P-members have the possibility to nominate an expert one month after the closing date -- complete information in AC/172/2000

  1. Approving: Does the National Committee approve the addition of the new proposal to the program of work of the committee [Yes/No] ?

  2. Only votes received from P-members before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.

  3. P-members not voting: Australia; Pakistan; Poland(3)

  4. CD/CDV: Does the National Committee agree with direct submission of the draft accompanying the proposal as a Committee Draft/Committee Draft for Voting [Y if Yes] ?

  5. Participation : Is the National Committee prepared to participate in the development of the project [Yes/No] ? (Only those voting in favour of the proposal itself have their willingness to participate considered as part of the final decision.)

  6. Acceptance criteria for TS/IS:

    • approval of the work item by a simple majority of the P-members voting

    • at least 4 P-members in the case of a committee with 16 or fewer P-members, or at least 5 P-members in the case of committees with 17 or more P-members, have nominated or confirmed the name of an expert and approved the new work item proposal

*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.