International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 86B

Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
23 23 100 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
26 0 0 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 86B/3335/FDIS

 

Project : IEC 61755-3-6 am1 Ed. 1.0

IEC 61755-3-6 A1 Ed. 1.0: Fibre optic connector optical interfaces - Part 3-6: Optical interface - 2,5 mm and 1,25 mm diameter cylindrical 8 degrees angled-PC composite ferrule using Cu-Ni-alloy as fibre surrounding material, single mode fibre

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
86B/3335/FDIS 2011-12-02 2012-02-03


Compilation of Comments
CC file    
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia P 2012-02-03 Y -
Austria P 2012-01-31 Y -
Belgium P 2012-01-09 Y -
Brazil O 2012-02-03 A -
Canada P 2012-02-03 Y -
China P 2012-02-02 Y -
Czech Republic P 2012-01-23 Y -
Denmark P 2012-01-30 A -
Finland P 2012-02-03 Y -
France P 2012-02-02 Y -
Germany P 2012-01-25 Y -
Greece O 2012-01-30 Y -
Hungary P 2012-02-02 Y -
India P 2012-01-24 Y -
Ireland O 2012-01-24 Y -
Israel P 2012-02-02 A -
Italy P 2012-01-30 Y -
Japan P 2012-01-30 Y -
Korea, Republic of P 2012-02-03 Y -
Mexico P 2012-01-27 Y -
Netherlands P 2012-01-30 Y -
Pakistan P 2012-01-30 Y -
Poland P 2012-01-16 A -
Portugal P 2012-02-03 A -
Romania P 2012-02-03 Y -
Russian Federation P 2012-02-03 Y -
Saudi Arabia O 2012-01-17 A -
Slovenia - 2012-01-24 Y -
Spain P 2012-01-27 Y -
Sweden P 2012-02-02 Y -
Switzerland P 2012-02-02 Y -
Thailand P
United Kingdom P 2012-01-18 Y -
United States of America P

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to publish the FDIS as an International Standard:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: Thailand; United States of America(2).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.