International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 86A

Fibres and cables

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
21 19 90.5 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
25 2 8 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 86A/1485/CDV

 

Project : IEC 60794-2-51 Ed. 1.0

IEC 60794-2-51/Ed1: Optical fibre cables - Part 2-51: Indoor optical fibre cables - Detail specification for simplex and duplex cables for use in cords for controlled environment

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
86A/1485/CDV 2013-01-04 2013-04-05
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
86A/1560/RVC 2013-10-25  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Austria P 2013-04-04 Y Y
Belgium P 2013-03-12 Y -
Brazil O 2013-04-05 A -
China P 2013-04-03 Y -
Denmark P 2013-03-20 Y -
Finland P 2013-03-28 Y -
France P 2013-04-02 N Y
Germany P 2013-03-27 Y -
Greece O 2013-04-05 Y -
Ireland O 2013-03-26 Y -
Israel P 2013-04-02 Y -
Italy P 2013-04-05 Y -
Japan P 2013-04-01 Y Y
Korea, Republic of P 2013-04-05 Y -
Latvia - 2013-04-04 A -
Mexico P 2013-04-04 Y -
Netherlands P 2013-03-22 Y -
Norway P 2013-04-05 A -
Pakistan P
Poland P 2013-04-03 A -
Portugal P 2013-04-05 Y -
Romania O 2013-04-04 Y -
Russian Federation P 2013-03-27 Y -
South Africa P 2013-04-04 Y Y
Spain O 2013-03-15 Y -
Sweden P 2013-03-08 Y Y
Switzerland P 2013-04-04 Y Y
Thailand P 2013-04-05 Y -
United Kingdom P 2013-03-12 N Y
United States of America P 2013-03-12 Y -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: Pakistan(1).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.