International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 86A

Fibres and cables

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members
Voting
P-Members
In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
17 17 100 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total
Votes Cast
Total
Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
21 0 0 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 86A/1475/CDV

 

Project : IEC 60794-1-2 Ed. 3.0

IEC 60794-1-2/Ed3 :Optical fibre cables - Part 1-2: Generic specification -Cross reference table for optical cable test procedures

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
86A/1475/CDV 2012-11-23 2013-03-01
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
86A/1515/RVC 2013-03-08  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Austria P 2013-01-30 Y -
Belgium P 2013-02-06 Y -
Brazil O 2013-03-01 A -
China P 2013-03-01 Y -
Denmark P 2013-02-27 A -
Finland P 2013-02-21 Y -
France P 2013-02-26 Y -
Germany P 2013-02-27 Y Y
Greece O 2013-03-01 Y -
Ireland O 2013-02-25 Y -
Israel P 2013-03-01 Y -
Italy P 2013-03-01 Y -
Japan P 2013-02-27 Y Y
Korea, Republic of P
Mexico P 2013-02-28 Y -
Netherlands P 2013-02-18 A -
Norway P 2013-02-28 Y -
Pakistan P 2013-02-26 Y -
Poland P 2013-02-28 A -
Portugal P 2013-03-01 A -
Qatar - 2013-02-27 Y -
Russian Federation P 2013-02-25 Y -
South Africa P 2013-02-28 Y Y
Spain O 2013-02-07 Y -
Sweden P 2013-01-31 Y Y
Switzerland P 2013-02-28 Y Y
Thailand P 2013-02-28 Y -
United Kingdom P 2013-02-21 A -
United States of America P 2013-02-28 A Y

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: Korea, Republic of(1).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.