International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 86A

Fibres and cables

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
21 19 90.5 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
25 2 8 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 86A/1451/FDIS

 

Project : IEC 60794-1-23 Ed. 1.0

IEC 60794-1-23/Ed1: Optical fibre cables - Part 1-23: Generic specification - Basic optical cable test procedures -Cable element test methods

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
86A/1451/FDIS 2012-06-01 2012-08-03

Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
86A/1469/RVD 2012-08-10  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Austria P 2012-07-25 Y -
Belgium P 2012-07-10 Y -
Brazil O 2012-08-03 A -
China P 2012-08-03 Y -
Denmark P 2012-07-10 Y -
Finland P 2012-08-02 Y -
France P 2012-07-23 Y -
Germany P 2012-07-11 Y -
Greece O 2012-07-23 Y -
India P 2012-08-01 Y -
Ireland O 2012-07-23 Y -
Israel P 2012-08-02 Y -
Italy P 2012-08-02 Y -
Japan P 2012-07-27 Y -
Korea, Republic of P 2012-08-01 Y -
Mexico P 2012-08-02 Y -
Netherlands P 2012-08-02 A -
Norway P 2012-08-03 A -
Pakistan P 2012-08-03 Y -
Poland P 2012-08-03 A -
Portugal P 2012-08-03 A -
Qatar - 2012-08-02 A -
Romania O 2012-08-03 Y -
Russian Federation P 2012-07-30 Y -
South Africa P 2012-07-31 N Y
Spain O 2012-07-04 Y -
Sweden P 2012-08-02 Y -
Switzerland P 2012-07-09 Y -
Thailand P 2012-07-09 Y -
United Kingdom P 2012-07-13 Y -
United States of America P 2012-08-03 N Y

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to publish the FDIS as an International Standard:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: (0).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.