International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 65C

Industrial networks

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members
Voting
P-Members
In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
22 21 95.5 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total
Votes Cast
Total
Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
25 1 4 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 65C/696/CDV

 

Project : IEC 61158-1 Ed. 1.0

IEC 61158-1/Ed 1: Industrial communication networks - Fieldbus specifications - Part 1: Overview and guidance for the IEC 61158 and IEC 61784 series

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
65C/696/CDV 2012-05-11 2012-10-12
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
65C/724/RVC 2012-12-21  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia O 2012-10-11 A -
Austria P 2012-10-05 Y Y
Belgium P 2012-09-20 Y -
Brazil O 2012-10-11 A -
Canada P 2012-10-09 Y -
China P 2012-10-12 Y -
Croatia - 2012-10-12 Y -
Denmark P 2012-10-12 Y -
Finland P 2012-10-11 Y -
France P 2012-10-11 Y Y
Germany P 2012-10-08 Y Y
Greece O 2012-10-09 A -
Ireland O 2012-09-26 Y -
Italy P 2012-10-11 Y Y
Japan P 2012-10-02 Y -
Korea, Republic of P 2012-10-08 Y -
Malaysia P 2012-10-11 Y -
Mexico P 2012-10-04 A -
Netherlands P 2012-10-02 Y -
Norway P 2012-10-12 Y -
Poland P 2012-10-11 A -
Portugal P 2012-10-12 Y -
Qatar - 2012-10-10 A -
Romania P 2012-10-12 Y -
Russian Federation P 2012-10-11 Y -
Slovakia P 2012-10-10 Y -
Slovenia O 2012-10-04 Y -
Spain P 2012-10-09 Y -
Sweden P 2012-10-08 A -
Switzerland P 2012-08-20 N Y
United Kingdom P 2012-07-20 Y Y
United States of America P 2012-10-01 Y -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: (0).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.