International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 65B

Measurement and control devices

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
17 17 100 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
21 0 0 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 65B/917A/FDIS

 

Project : IEC 60770-3 Ed. 2.0

IEC 60770-3 Ed 2.0: Transmitters for use in industrial-process control systems - Part 3: Methods for performance evaluation of intelligent transmitters

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
65B/917A/FDIS 2014-03-14 2014-05-09

Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
65B/930/RVD 2014-05-16  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Austria P 2014-04-29 Y -
Belgium P 2014-04-18 Y -
Brazil O 2014-05-09 A -
Canada P 2014-05-05 Y -
China P 2014-05-09 Y -
Croatia O 2014-05-07 Y -
Denmark P 2014-05-06 A -
Finland P 2014-05-09 Y -
France P 2014-04-17 Y -
Germany P 2014-05-09 Y -
Greece O 2014-05-09 A -
Ireland O 2014-04-10 Y -
Italy P 2014-05-06 Y -
Japan P 2014-04-24 Y -
Korea, Republic of P 2014-04-25 Y -
Latvia - 2014-05-08 A -
Mexico P 2014-05-08 A -
Netherlands P 2014-04-29 Y -
Pakistan P
Poland P 2014-05-06 A -
Portugal O 2014-05-09 A -
Qatar - 2014-05-07 Y -
Romania P 2014-04-25 Y -
Russian Federation P 2014-05-07 Y -
Slovakia P 2014-04-24 Y -
Slovenia O 2014-05-08 Y -
Spain P 2014-05-08 A -
Sweden P 2014-05-09 Y -
Switzerland P 2014-04-15 A -
Ukraine P
United Kingdom P 2014-04-29 Y -
United States of America P 2014-04-11 Y -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to publish the FDIS as an International Standard:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: Pakistan; Ukraine(2).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.