International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 34B

Lamp caps and holders

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members
Voting
P-Members
In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
17 17 100 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total
Votes Cast
Total
Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
26 0 0 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 34B/1699/CDV

 

Project : IEC 60400 am2 Ed. 7.0

IEC 60400 Ed.7: Amendment 2 - Lampholders for tubular fluorescent lamps and starterholders

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
34B/1699/CDV 2013-07-26 2013-11-01
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
34B/1713/RVC 2013-11-08  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia P 2013-10-28 Y -
Austria O 2013-10-29 A -
Belarus O 2013-11-01 Y -
Belgium P 2013-10-08 Y -
China P 2013-10-30 A -
Croatia - 2013-10-31 Y -
Denmark P 2013-10-30 Y -
Finland O 2013-10-31 A -
France P 2013-10-29 Y -
Germany P 2013-10-29 Y Y
Greece P 2013-10-30 A -
Hungary P 2013-10-25 Y -
India P
Indonesia P 2013-10-31 A -
Ireland - 2013-10-29 Y -
Italy P 2013-10-28 Y -
Japan P 2013-09-20 Y Y
Korea, Republic of P 2013-10-23 Y -
Latvia - 2013-10-25 A -
Mexico O 2013-10-31 Y -
Moldova - 2013-10-31 Y -
Netherlands P 2013-10-21 Y -
Pakistan P
Poland O 2013-10-25 Y -
Portugal P 2013-11-01 Y -
Qatar - 2013-10-30 Y -
Romania O 2013-10-25 Y -
Russian Federation P 2013-11-01 Y -
Serbia P 2013-09-24 Y -
Spain P 2013-10-25 Y -
Sweden P 2013-09-05 Y -
Switzerland O 2013-09-24 Y -
Thailand P 2013-11-01 Y -
United Kingdom P 2013-10-10 A -
United States of America P 2013-09-30 Y -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: India; Pakistan(2).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.