International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 34A

Lamps

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
24 21 87.5 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
30 3 10 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 34A/1612/CDV

 

Project : IEC 62663-1 Ed. 1.0

IEC 62663-1 Ed.1: Non-ballasted LED-lamps - Part 1: Safety specifications

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
34A/1612/CDV 2012-09-14 2012-12-14
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
34A/1735/RVC 2013-11-15  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia P 2012-12-07 Y -
Austria P 2012-12-13 A -
Belarus O 2012-12-07 Y -
Belgium P 2012-11-19 Y -
Brazil O 2012-12-14 A -
China P 2012-12-13 Y -
Croatia - 2012-12-13 Y -
Czech Republic O 2012-10-12 Y Y
Denmark P 2012-12-13 Y Y
Finland P 2012-12-14 N Y
France P 2012-12-12 N Y
Germany P 2012-12-13 Y Y
Greece P 2012-12-12 A -
Hungary P 2012-12-14 A -
India P 2012-12-11 Y -
Italy P 2012-10-23 Y -
Japan P 2012-12-11 Y Y
Jordan P 2012-12-13 Y -
Korea, Republic of P 2012-12-10 Y -
Mexico P 2012-12-13 Y -
Netherlands P 2012-11-29 N Y
Pakistan - 2012-12-05 Y -
Philippines, Rep. of the P
Poland O 2012-12-06 Y -
Portugal P 2012-12-14 Y -
Qatar - 2012-12-12 Y -
Romania P 2012-12-14 Y -
Russian Federation P 2012-11-27 Y Y
Serbia P 2012-10-10 Y -
South Africa P 2012-12-14 Y -
Spain P 2012-12-12 Y -
Sweden P 2012-12-11 Y -
Thailand P 2012-10-16 Y -
United Kingdom P 2012-11-22 Y -
United States of America P 2012-11-20 Y -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: Philippines, Rep. of the(1).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.