International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

SC 34A

Lamps

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
23 23 100 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
29 0 0 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 34A/1602/CDV

 

Project : IEC 60081 am5 Ed. 5.0

Amendment 5 to IEC 60081 Ed.5: Double-capped fluorescent lamps - Performance specifications

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
34A/1602/CDV 2012-08-03 2013-01-04
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
34A/1644/RVC 2013-01-11  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia P 2012-12-13 Y -
Austria P 2012-12-20 A -
Belarus O 2012-12-14 Y -
Belgium P 2012-12-11 Y -
Brazil O 2013-01-04 Y -
China P 2012-12-28 Y -
Croatia - 2013-01-04 Y -
Denmark P 2012-12-17 Y -
Finland P 2013-01-03 Y -
France P 2013-01-03 A Y
Germany P 2013-01-02 Y -
Greece P 2012-12-20 A -
Hungary P 2013-01-04 Y -
India P 2012-12-31 Y -
Italy P 2012-10-23 Y -
Japan P 2012-12-10 Y Y
Jordan P 2012-12-31 Y -
Korea, Republic of P 2012-12-24 Y -
Mexico P 2013-01-04 Y -
Netherlands P 2012-12-13 Y -
Pakistan - 2012-12-24 Y -
Philippines, Rep. of the P
Poland O 2013-01-03 Y -
Portugal P 2013-01-04 Y -
Qatar - 2012-12-25 Y -
Romania P 2012-12-17 Y -
Russian Federation P 2012-11-27 Y -
Serbia P 2012-12-13 Y -
South Africa P 2013-01-02 Y -
Spain P 2012-12-28 Y -
Sweden P 2012-09-11 Y -
Thailand P 2012-12-25 Y -
United Kingdom P 2012-12-12 A -
United States of America P 2012-12-10 Y -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: Philippines, Rep. of the(1).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.