International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

CIS/A

Radio-interference measurements and statistical methods

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members
Voting
P-Members
In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
24 24 100 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total
Votes Cast
Total
Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
31 0 0 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document CIS/A/1049/FDIS

 

Project : CISPR 16-4-2 am1 Ed. 2.0

Amendment 1 to CISPR 16-4-2: Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods - Part 4-2: Uncertainties, statistics and limit modelling - Measurement instrumentation uncertain

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
CIS/A/1049/FDIS 2013-10-18 2014-01-03


Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
CIS/A/1058/RVD 2014-01-10  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia P 2013-12-19 Y -
Austria P 2013-12-16 Y -
Belarus O 2013-12-20 Y -
Belgium P 2013-12-17 Y -
Canada P 2013-12-17 Y -
China P 2014-01-02 Y -
Croatia O 2014-01-03 Y -
Czech Republic P 2013-12-11 Y -
Denmark P 2013-12-16 Y -
Estonia P
Finland P 2014-01-03 Y -
France P 2013-12-18 Y -
Germany P 2013-12-16 Y -
Greece O 2013-12-17 A -
Ireland O 2013-12-04 Y -
Italy P 2013-12-19 Y -
Japan P 2014-01-02 Y -
Korea, Republic of P 2013-12-26 Y -
Mexico P 2014-01-03 Y -
Netherlands P 2013-12-09 Y -
Norway P 2013-12-19 Y -
Poland O 2013-12-27 Y -
Portugal O 2014-01-03 Y -
Qatar - 2014-01-01 Y -
Romania P 2013-12-13 Y -
Russian Federation P 2013-12-11 Y -
Serbia P 2013-12-24 Y -
Slovenia - 2013-12-24 Y -
South Africa P 2013-12-19 Y -
Spain P 2014-01-03 A -
Sweden P 2013-11-29 Y -
Switzerland P 2013-12-12 Y -
Thailand P
Turkey O 2013-12-30 A -
United Kingdom P 2013-12-13 Y -
United States of America P 2013-12-17 Y -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to publish the FDIS as an International Standard:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: Estonia; Thailand(2).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.