International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

CIS/A

Radio-interference measurements and statistical methods

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members
Voting
P-Members
In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
25 24 96 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total
Votes Cast
Total
Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
29 1 3.4 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document CIS/A/1028/CDV

 

Project : CISPR 16-1-5 Ed. 2.0

Amendment 2 to CISPR 16-1-5: Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods - Part 1-5: Radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus - Specifications and validation procedures for CALTS and REFTS from 30 MHz to 1 000 MHz

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
CIS/A/1028/CDV 2013-04-19 2013-07-19
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
CIS/A/1046/RVC 2013-09-27  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia P 2013-07-18 Y -
Austria P 2013-07-17 N Y
Belarus - 2013-07-19 Y -
Belgium P 2013-06-25 Y -
Canada P
China P 2013-07-19 Y Y
Czech Republic P 2013-07-15 Y -
Denmark P 2013-07-05 Y -
Finland P 2013-06-28 Y -
France P 2013-07-15 Y -
Germany P 2013-07-17 Y Y
Greece O 2013-07-17 A -
Ireland O 2013-07-15 Y -
Italy P 2013-07-11 Y Y
Japan P 2013-07-19 Y Y
Korea, Republic of P 2013-07-15 Y -
Latvia - 2013-07-08 A -
Mexico P 2013-07-18 Y -
Netherlands P 2013-07-17 Y Y
Norway P 2013-07-16 Y -
Poland P 2013-07-16 Y -
Portugal O 2013-07-19 A -
Qatar - 2013-07-17 Y -
Romania P 2013-07-12 Y -
Russian Federation P 2013-07-15 Y -
Serbia P 2013-06-12 Y -
South Africa P 2013-07-19 Y -
Spain P 2013-07-19 Y -
Sweden P 2013-06-14 A -
Switzerland P 2013-07-11 Y -
Thailand P 2013-07-17 Y -
Turkey O 2013-07-11 Y -
United Kingdom P 2013-07-17 Y Y
United States of America P 2013-07-19 Y -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: Canada(1).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.