International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

CIS/A

Radio-interference measurements and statistical methods

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
24 22 91.7 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
29 2 6.9 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document CIS/A/1027A/CDV

 

Project : CISPR 16-1-6 Ed. 1.0

CISPR 16-1-6: Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods - Part 1-6: radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus - EMC-antenna calibration

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
CIS/A/1027A/CDV 2013-04-19 2013-09-06
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
CIS/A/1048/RVC 2013-09-27  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia P 2013-09-06 Y Y
Austria P 2013-09-05 N Y
Belarus - 2013-08-23 Y -
Belgium P 2013-08-13 Y -
Canada P 2013-09-06 Y -
China P 2013-09-06 Y Y
Croatia O 2013-09-06 Y -
Czech Republic P 2013-09-03 Y -
Denmark P 2013-09-02 Y -
Finland P 2013-06-28 Y -
France P 2013-09-05 A -
Germany P 2013-09-02 Y Y
Greece O 2013-09-03 A -
Ireland O 2013-08-26 Y -
Italy P 2013-09-05 Y Y
Japan P 2013-09-05 Y Y
Korea, Republic of P 2013-09-06 Y Y
Latvia - 2013-09-02 A -
Mexico P 2013-09-05 Y -
Netherlands P 2013-09-03 N Y
Norway P 2013-09-03 Y -
Poland O 2013-09-02 Y -
Portugal O 2013-09-06 A -
Romania P 2013-08-01 Y -
Russian Federation P 2013-09-06 Y -
Serbia P 2013-08-22 Y -
South Africa P 2013-09-02 Y -
Spain P 2013-09-06 A -
Sweden P 2013-08-27 Y -
Switzerland P 2013-09-02 Y -
Thailand P 2013-05-20 Y -
Turkey O 2013-07-11 Y -
United Kingdom P 2013-09-06 Y Y
United States of America P 2013-09-04 Y Y

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: (0).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.