International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

CIS/A

Radio-interference measurements and statistical methods

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
25 22 88 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
32 3 9.4 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document CIS/A/1001/CDV

 

Project : CISPR 16-2-1 Ed. 3.0

Amendment 3 - CISPR 16-2-1: Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods - Part 2-1: Methods of measurement of disturbances and immunity - Conducteddisturbance measurements

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
CIS/A/1001/CDV 2012-04-27 2012-09-28
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
CIS/A/1026/RVC 2013-01-18  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia P 2012-09-20 N Y
Austria P 2012-09-26 Y -
Belarus - 2012-09-28 Y -
Belgium P 2012-09-10 Y -
Canada P 2012-09-28 Y -
China P 2012-09-28 Y -
Croatia O 2012-09-28 Y -
Czech Republic P 2012-09-14 Y -
Denmark P 2012-09-26 Y -
Finland P 2012-09-28 Y Y
France P 2012-09-20 Y -
Germany P 2012-09-27 Y -
Greece O 2012-09-25 Y -
Ireland O 2012-09-06 Y -
Italy P 2012-09-27 Y Y
Japan P 2012-09-27 N Y
Korea, Republic of P 2012-09-20 Y -
Mexico P 2012-09-28 A -
Netherlands P 2012-09-27 N Y
Norway P 2012-09-27 Y Y
Poland P 2012-09-27 Y -
Portugal O 2012-09-28 Y -
Qatar - 2012-09-26 Y -
Romania P 2012-09-27 Y -
Russian Federation P 2012-09-27 Y -
Serbia P 2012-08-20 Y -
South Africa P 2012-09-25 Y -
Spain P 2012-09-28 A -
Sweden P 2012-07-09 Y -
Switzerland P 2012-09-24 Y -
Thailand P 2012-07-24 Y -
Turkey O 2012-09-27 Y -
United Kingdom P 2012-09-26 Y Y
United States of America P 2012-09-20 Y -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: (0).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.