International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

CIS/A

Radio-interference measurements and statistical methods

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members
Voting
P-Members
In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
24 23 95.8 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total
Votes Cast
Total
Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
28 1 3.6 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document CIS/A/998/CDV

 

Project : CISPR 16-1-2 am3 f1 Ed. 1.0

CISPR 16-1-2 Am3 f1 Ed1: Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods - Part 1-2: Radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus - Coupling devices for conducted disturbance measurements

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
CIS/A/998/CDV 2012-04-13 2012-09-14
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
CIS/A/1019/RVC 2012-09-28  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia P 2012-09-06 Y -
Austria P 2012-09-13 Y -
Belarus - 2012-09-11 Y -
Belgium P 2012-08-24 Y -
Canada P 2012-09-14 Y -
China P 2012-09-14 Y -
Czech Republic P 2012-09-14 Y -
Denmark P 2012-09-04 Y -
Finland P 2012-09-12 Y -
France P 2012-09-12 Y -
Germany P 2012-09-14 N Y
Greece O 2012-09-13 A -
Ireland O 2012-08-28 Y -
Italy P 2012-09-14 Y Y
Japan P 2012-09-13 Y -
Korea, Republic of P 2012-09-10 Y Y
Mexico P 2012-09-14 A -
Netherlands P 2012-09-13 Y -
Norway P 2012-09-11 Y -
Poland P 2012-09-05 A -
Portugal O 2012-09-14 A -
Qatar - 2012-09-12 Y -
Romania P 2012-09-14 Y -
Russian Federation P 2012-08-14 Y -
Serbia P 2012-08-20 A -
South Africa P 2012-09-10 Y Y
Spain P 2012-09-14 Y -
Sweden P 2012-07-09 Y Y
Switzerland P 2012-09-06 Y -
Thailand P 2012-07-02 Y -
Turkey O 2012-09-05 Y -
United Kingdom P 2012-09-12 Y Y
United States of America P 2012-09-10 Y Y

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: (0).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.