International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

TC 105

Fuel cell technologies

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members
Voting
P-Members
In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
12 7 58.3 >=66.7% REJECTED

All Votes

Total
Votes Cast
Total
Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
19 5 26.3 <=25% REJECTED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

REJECTED

Document 105/453/CDV

 

Project : IEC 62282-6-400 Ed. 1.0

IEC 62282-6-400 Ed.1: Fuel cell technologies - Part 6-400: Micro fuel cell power systems - Power and data interchangeability

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
105/453/CDV 2013-09-13 2013-12-13
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Austria O 2013-12-11 A -
Belgium O 2013-11-19 A -
Brazil O 2013-12-13 A -
Canada P 2013-12-10 N Y
China P 2013-12-13 Y Y
Czech Republic P 2013-11-15 Y -
Denmark P 2013-12-13 A -
Egypt P 2013-11-15 Y Y
Finland P 2013-12-11 Y -
France P 2013-11-14 N Y
Germany P 2013-12-12 Y -
Greece - 2013-12-10 A -
Hungary - 2013-12-13 Y -
Iran O 2013-12-11 Y -
Ireland - 2013-12-04 Y -
Italy P 2013-12-09 A -
Japan P
Korea, Republic of P 2013-10-18 Y -
Latvia - 2013-12-12 A -
Netherlands P 2013-10-10 A -
Poland O 2013-12-06 Y -
Portugal O 2013-12-13 A -
Qatar - 2013-12-11 A -
Romania O 2013-12-13 Y -
Russian Federation - 2013-12-06 Y -
South Africa P 2013-12-13 Y -
Spain P 2013-12-12 N Y
Switzerland P 2013-11-26 A -
Turkey O 2013-12-06 Y -
United Kingdom P 2013-11-28 N Y
United States of America P 2013-11-01 N Y

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: Japan(1).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.