International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

TC 29

Electroacoustics

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
17 17 100 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
18 0 0 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 29/796/CDV

 

Project : IEC 60318-3 Ed. 2.0

IEC 60318-3: Electroacoustics - Simulators of human head and ear - Part 3: Acoustic coupler for the calibration of supra-aural earphones used in audiometry

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
29/796/CDV 2013-01-11 2013-04-12
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
29/811A/RVC 2014-06-13  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia P 2013-04-12 Y Y
Austria P 2013-04-11 A -
Belgium O 2013-03-19 A -
Brazil O 2013-04-12 A -
Canada P 2013-04-10 Y Y
China P 2013-04-10 Y Y
Croatia O 2013-04-12 Y -
Czech Republic P 2013-04-05 Y -
Denmark P 2013-03-20 Y Y
Finland P 2013-03-15 A -
France P 2013-04-11 Y Y
Germany P 2013-04-05 Y -
Greece O 2013-04-12 A -
India P 2013-04-12 A -
Italy P 2013-04-10 Y Y
Japan P 2013-04-10 Y -
Korea, Republic of P 2013-04-05 Y -
Latvia - 2013-04-12 A -
Netherlands P 2013-04-11 A -
Norway P 2013-04-12 A -
Poland P 2013-04-04 Y Y
Portugal - 2013-04-12 A -
Qatar - 2013-04-10 A -
Romania P 2013-04-12 Y -
Russian Federation P 2013-04-12 Y -
South Africa P 2013-04-12 Y -
Spain P 2013-04-05 Y -
Sweden P 2013-04-11 A -
Switzerland P 2013-04-10 A -
United Kingdom P 2013-03-14 Y -
United States of America P 2013-03-26 Y Y

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: (0).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.