International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

TC 89

Fire hazard testing

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
16 15 93.8 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
21 1 4.8 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 89/1162/CDV

 

Project : IEC 60695-1-11 Ed. 2.0

IEC 60695-1-11 Ed 2.0: Fire hazard testing - Part 1-11: Guidance for assessing the fire hazard of electrotechnical products - Fire hazard assessment

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
89/1162/CDV 2013-02-22 2013-05-24
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
89/1190/RVC 2013-07-19  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia P 2013-05-24 Y -
Austria O 2013-05-23 A -
Belarus O 2013-05-24 Y -
Belgium P 2013-04-30 Y -
Brazil P 2013-05-24 A -
Canada P 2013-05-22 Y Y
China P 2013-05-24 Y Y
Czech Republic P 2013-05-23 Y -
Denmark P 2013-05-24 Y -
Finland O 2013-05-06 A -
France P 2013-05-22 Y -
Germany P 2013-05-22 Y -
Greece O 2013-04-18 A -
Italy P 2013-03-13 Y -
Japan P 2013-05-24 Y -
Korea, Republic of O 2013-05-20 Y -
Latvia - 2013-05-24 A -
Netherlands P 2013-05-15 Y -
New Zealand P 2013-03-06 A -
Poland O 2013-05-20 A -
Portugal - 2013-05-23 Y -
Qatar - 2013-05-23 Y -
Romania O 2013-05-23 Y -
Russian Federation P 2013-05-13 Y -
Spain P 2013-05-14 Y -
Sweden P 2013-05-24 N Y
United Kingdom P 2013-05-23 Y Y
United States of America P 2013-05-23 Y -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: (0).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.