International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

TC 79

Alarm and electronic security systems

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members
Voting
P-Members
In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
21 17 81 >=66.7% APPROVED


 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 79/419/DTS

 

Project : IEC/TS 60839-7-8 Ed. 1.0

IEC 60839-7-8 TS Ed.1: Alarm and electronic security systems - Part 7-8: Alarm transmission systems - Requirements for common protocol for alarm transmission using the Internet protocol

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
79/419/DTS 2013-05-17 2013-09-06
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
79/453/RVC 2013-11-22  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia P 2013-08-26 Y -
Austria P 2013-09-06 A -
Belgium P 2013-08-12 Y -
Canada P 2013-09-06 Y -
China P 2013-09-05 Y -
Croatia P 2013-07-12 Y -
Denmark P 2013-09-06 A -
Finland P 2013-06-03 Y -
France P 2013-08-29 Y -
Germany P 2013-09-02 Y -
Greece O 2013-09-03 A -
Ireland O 2013-08-26 A -
Italy P 2013-09-06 N Y
Japan P 2013-09-04 Y -
Korea, Republic of P 2013-09-03 Y -
Netherlands P 2013-08-26 Y -
New Zealand P 2013-09-06 N Y
Norway P 2013-08-29 N Y
Portugal P 2013-08-30 Y -
Russian Federation P 2013-09-06 A Y
Saudi Arabia O 2013-05-18 A -
Serbia P 2013-07-19 Y -
Slovenia - 2013-08-30 A -
Spain P 2013-09-03 Y -
Sweden P 2013-07-03 Y -
Switzerland P 2013-09-02 N Y
Ukraine P 2013-06-25 Y -
United Kingdom P 2013-09-06 Y -
United States of America P

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: United States of America(1).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.