International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

TC 76

Optical radiation safety and laser equipment

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
15 13 86.7 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
21 2 9.5 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 76/479/CDV

 

Project : IEC 60825-1 Ed. 3.0

IEC 60825-1: Safety of laser products - Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
76/479/CDV 2013-01-11 2013-04-12
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
76/494/RVC 2013-07-19  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Australia P 2013-04-05 Y Y
Austria P 2013-04-11 Y Y
Belgium P 2013-04-11 Y Y
Canada P 2013-04-10 Y Y
China P 2013-04-12 A -
Croatia O 2013-04-12 Y -
Czech Republic P 2013-04-10 Y -
Denmark O 2013-01-25 A -
Finland P 2013-04-10 A -
France O 2013-04-08 Y Y
Germany P 2013-04-11 N Y
Greece - 2013-04-12 A -
Hungary O 2013-04-08 Y -
Ireland O 2013-03-26 Y -
Israel P 2013-04-11 A -
Italy P 2013-04-12 N Y
Japan P 2013-04-12 Y Y
Korea, Republic of P 2013-04-05 Y -
Latvia - 2013-04-12 A -
Netherlands P 2013-04-11 Y -
Poland O 2013-04-03 Y -
Portugal P 2013-04-12 A -
Qatar - 2013-04-10 Y -
Romania P 2013-04-11 Y -
Russian Federation P 2013-04-12 Y -
Spain P 2013-04-12 Y -
Sweden P 2013-04-11 A -
Switzerland P 2013-03-14 A -
United Kingdom P 2013-03-14 Y -
United States of America P 2013-04-09 Y Y

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: (0).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.