International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

TC 9

Electrical equipment and systems for railways

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
22 22 100 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
25 0 0 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 9/1629/CDV

 

Project : IEC 61375-2-5 Ed. 1.0

IEC 61375-2-5 Ed.1: Electronic railway equipment - Train backbone - Part 2-5: Ethernet Train Backbone

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
9/1629/CDV 2012-01-27 2012-06-29
Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
9/1701A/RVC 2013-08-30  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Austria P 2012-06-11 Y -
Belarus O 2012-06-29 Y -
Belgium P 2012-06-05 Y -
Brazil O 2012-06-29 A -
Canada P 2012-06-25 Y Y
China P 2012-06-28 Y Y
Croatia O 2012-06-21 Y -
Czech Republic P 2012-06-26 Y Y
Denmark P 2012-06-28 Y -
Egypt P 2012-06-17 Y -
Finland P 2012-06-28 A -
France P 2012-06-27 Y Y
Germany P 2012-06-18 Y Y
Greece O 2012-06-29 A -
Hungary P
Italy P 2012-06-25 Y Y
Japan P 2012-06-25 Y Y
Korea, Republic of P 2012-06-22 Y -
Netherlands P 2012-05-23 Y -
Norway P 2012-06-26 Y -
Poland P 2012-06-13 Y -
Portugal P 2012-06-22 A -
Qatar - 2012-06-27 A -
Romania P 2012-06-29 Y -
Russian Federation P 2012-06-14 Y -
Serbia P 2012-06-14 Y -
Singapore P 2012-06-28 A -
Slovenia O 2012-06-01 Y -
Spain P 2012-06-28 Y -
Sweden P 2012-06-27 Y -
Switzerland P 2012-06-18 Y -
United Kingdom P 2012-06-13 Y Y
United States of America P 2012-06-29 A -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: Hungary(1).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.