International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

TC 10

Fluids for electrotechnical applications

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members

Voting
P-Members

In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
23 23 100 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total

Votes Cast
Total

Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
27 0 0 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 10/878/FDIS

 

Project : IEC 60296 Ed. 4.0

IEC 60296 Ed.4: Fluids for electrotechnical applications - Unused mineral insulating oils for transformers and switchgear

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
10/878/FDIS 2011-11-25 2012-01-27


Compilation of Comments
CC file    
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Austria P 2012-01-25 Y -
Belgium P 2012-01-03 Y -
Brazil O 2012-01-27 A -
Canada P 2012-01-26 Y -
China P 2012-01-20 Y -
Czech Republic P 2012-01-10 Y -
Denmark P 2012-01-13 A -
Egypt - 2012-01-27 Y
Finland O 2012-01-27 A -
France P 2012-01-27 A -
Germany P 2012-01-27 Y -
Hungary P 2012-01-27 Y -
Ireland O 2012-01-06 Y -
Israel P 2011-12-06 Y -
Italy P 2012-01-17 Y -
Japan P 2012-01-17 Y -
Korea, Republic of O 2011-12-27 Y -
Mexico O 2012-01-26 A -
Netherlands P 2012-01-20 Y -
Norway P 2012-01-27 A -
Poland P 2012-01-24 Y -
Portugal P 2012-01-26 Y -
Romania O 2011-12-16 Y -
Russian Federation P 2012-01-24 Y -
Serbia P 2012-01-11 Y -
Slovakia P 2012-01-24 Y -
South Africa P 2012-01-26 Y -
Spain P 2012-01-25 Y -
Sweden P 2012-01-23 Y -
Switzerland P 2012-01-05 Y -
Ukraine P 2012-01-24 Y -
United Kingdom P 2012-01-18 Y -
United States of America P 2012-01-26 Y -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to publish the FDIS as an International Standard:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: (0).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.