International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and related technologies

TC 1

Terminology

 

Vote for P-Members

P-Members
Voting
P-Members
In favour
In favour %
Criteria
Result
14 13 92.9 >=66.7% APPROVED

All Votes

Total
Votes Cast
Total
Against
Against %
Criteria
Result
17 1 5.9 <=25% APPROVED

 Illustration: Voting

Voting Result

APPROVED

Document 1/2242/FDIS

 

Project : IEC 60050-561 Ed. 2.0

IEC 60050-561: International electrotecnical vocabulary - Part 561: Piezoelectric,dielectric and electrostatic devices and associated materials for frequency control, selection and detection

 

Reference Circulation date Closing date Downloads
1/2242/FDIS 2013-09-13 2013-11-15

Compilation of Comments
CC file    
Voting Result
1/2247/RVD 2013-11-22  
 
export to xls file

Result of Voting

Country
Status
Received
Vote
Comments
Austria O 2013-11-14 A -
Belgium O 2013-10-24 A -
China P 2013-11-14 Y -
Czech Republic P 2013-11-05 Y -
Egypt P 2013-11-12 Y -
Finland P 2013-11-15 A -
France P 2013-11-12 N Y
Germany P 2013-10-29 Y -
Greece O 2013-11-14 Y -
Ireland O 2013-11-11 Y -
Italy P 2013-11-11 Y -
Japan P 2013-11-06 Y -
Korea, Republic of P 2013-11-05 Y -
Mexico P 2013-11-14 Y -
Norway P 2013-11-14 A -
Poland P 2013-11-14 Y -
Portugal P 2013-11-15 Y -
Qatar - 2013-11-13 A -
Romania P 2013-11-14 Y -
Russian Federation P 2013-11-15 Y -
Slovenia O 2013-11-13 Y -
Spain P 2013-11-15 A -
Sweden P 2013-11-12 A -
Switzerland P 2013-11-14 A -
Ukraine P
United Kingdom P 2013-11-07 A -
United States of America P 2013-11-14 Y -

NOTES:



  1. Vote: Does the National Committee agree to publish the FDIS as an International Standard:
    Y = In favour; N = Against; A = Abstention.

  2. Only votes received before the closing date are counted in determining the decision.
    Late Votes: (0).

  3. Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.

  4. P-members not voting: Ukraine(1).


*Comments rejected because they were not submitted in the IEC Comment form.
**Vote rejected due to lack of justification statement.